fbpx

Samsung Air Purifier Review and Comparison

samsung air purifier review
Posted by: admin Comments: 0

The situation of the pandemic sparked a wave of concern in other countries when reports of infinite deaths circulated media. CDC and EPA revealed that COVID-19 is an airborne virus.

The research elaborated that when an infected person sneezes or coughs in the shared air, tiny respiratory droplets travel through the air via aerosols to a distance of 6ft. and can hang for as long as 3 hours.

Consequently, governments imposed strict restrictions to minimize the risk of transmission. Gradually, the world transitioned toward the recovery phase with ease in restrictions.

However, there was still a requirement of sufficient precautionary measures to facilitate the reopening of offices and schools, and improving indoor air quality was one of them. 

 

Indoor Air Quality and COVID-19

According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), improvements in indoor air quality through natural and mechanical ventilation can significantly minimize the risk of virus transmission.

EPA suggests that increasing the ventilation system in enclosed and highly-occupied places is one of the most important approaches to reduce transmission. The circulation of fresh air in the indoor space dilutes the concentration level of airborne particles, leaving behind a safe breathing environment for occupants.

Not only does ventilation clean the air, but it also minimizes surface contamination by filtering the particles that could fall on the surface and become a cause of infection.

However, the main challenge is when building infrastructure does not allow for natural ventilation, and that’s where air purifiers come into play to ventilate the space mechanically.

 

 

Minimizing the Risk of COVID-19 Transmission with Air Purifiers in Australian Schools

When natural ventilation is not possible, air cleaners are particularly effective in extracting the contaminants from the air, which reduces the risk of virus transmission. However, according to EPA, air purification technology must feature a HEPA filter in order to be effective against the novel coronavirus.

These are High-Efficiency Particulate Air filters that are powerful enough to capture particles of size as small as 0.3 microns through a fine mesh. 

To facilitate the reopening of schools in Australia, the government has announced the “Australian First” package, which includes an investment of USD 190 million.

The primary objective of the hefty project is to protect the health and well-being of school staff and students when they return to school. The government has signed a contract with Samsung to install 51,000 air purifiers in government, private, and low-fee Catholic institutions nationwide.

The question, however, is whether Samsung air purifiers are effective in creating a safety net and facilitating Australia in reopening Victorian schools? Let’s go through the Samsung air purifier review to get deeper into the details.

 

Samsung Air Purifier Review

The giant consumer electronics conglomerate Samsung has signed a contract with the Australian government, but are their air purifiers really worth it? Here is our Samsung air purifier review to help you decide.

First and foremost, the engineering specifications of the Samsung AX7000 are not readily available, which makes it difficult to analyze the product and its efficiency and effectiveness against the removal of airborne particulates.

The electronics giant has not published the details regarding the specification of the HEPA filters and their quality, leading to uncertainty as to whether the air purification technology is powerful enough to capture the particles of size as small as 0.3 microns, as suggested by EPA.

On the other hand, Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) at its maximum speed, which is the TURBO function, is 776 cubic meters per hour. Therefore, the CADR is likely to be 386.5 cubic meters per hour at the mid fan point.

Another critical point is the noise level. It is important to install an air purifier that has a minimum noise level in the educational environment. However, as per our Samsung air purifier review, the lowest noise level of the Samsung air purifier is 53 dB(A).

It is way beyond a normal sound level at quieter operation, which means that the school staff won’t be able to operate the unit at maximum fan speed due to unacceptable noise levels. Hence, the fan speed has to be set at mid-level.

The mid-level fan point also indicates that there will likely be two air exchanges every, which is considerably lower than the global standard guidelines.

Besides providing a Samsung air purifier review, we are also comparing it to the Euromate Pure Air Shield 3300. The air purification technology boasts a medical-grade HEPA 14 filter that is proven efficient in filtering out microbes, viruses, aerosols, and fine dust by up to 99.995 percent.

The Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) at speed 4 (mid fan point) equals 1200 cubic meters per hour, and the noise level is just 48 dB(A), while at maximum speed, the CADR equals 2200 cubic meters per hour.

Our Euromate PAS 3300 delivers a total of five air exchanges every hour, which ensures a constant flow of fresh air in the indoor space; however, at maximum speed, the air exchanges double  – 10 per hour. When operating at quiet mode, the noise level is maintained at 30 dB(A), while at TURBO speed, it only reaches up to 63 dB(A), which is quite less than what Samsung has to offer at its quiet mode. 

 

The Bottom Line

Samsung air purifier review suggests that while the company’s air purifiers are being installed in schools nationwide, Euromate PAS 3300 is more efficient and effective.

It has multiple air exchanges, quiet fan modes, and a medical-grade HEPA filter to fight against the virus with 99.95 percent efficiency.

The powerful technology of PAS 3300 will facilitate schools in reopening and ensuring the wellbeing of everyone.

Clean your indoor air today!